Yuny-Li Home Care Sdn Bhd v Mohan Raj Ratnam

JurisdictionMalaysia
CourtHigh Court (Malaysia)
Year2009

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 cases
  • Motordata Research Consortium Sdn Bhd v Ahmad Shahril Abdullah and Others
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2017
  • ANANDARAJ A/L S. THAVARAJ vs MISC BERHAD
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 29 December 2021
    ...or applied the wrong principles of law. (See the Court of Appeal case of Yoong Sze Fatt v Pengkalan Securities Sdn Bhd [2010] 1 CLJ 484; [2010] 7 AMR 80; [2010] 1 MLJ 85 at 106-107). I therefore see no reason to interfere with the decision of the learned 35. In my judgment, appellate interv......
  • KWANG SHEN STEEL INDUSTRIES SDN BHD vs NG CHEE MENG
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 3 December 2021
    ...or applied the wrong principles of law. (See the Court of Appeal case of Yoong Sze Fatt v Pengkalan Securities Sdn Bhd [2010] 1 CLJ 484; [2010] 7 AMR 80; [2010] 1 MLJ 85 at 106-107). Thus, | see no reason to interfere with the decision of the In my judgment, appellate intervention is not wa......
  • LOH SWEE LIANGLOH SWEE LIANG vs AMGENERAL INSURANCE BERHADAMGENERAL INSURANCE BERHAD
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 14 July 2021
    ...contrary to the documentary evidence. (See the Court of Appeal case of Yoong Sze Fatt v Pengkalan Securities Sdn Bhd [2010] 1 CLJ 484; [2010] 7 AMR 80; [2010] 1 MLJ 85 at 17. I see no reason to interfere with the findings and decision of the MCJ. My reasons are as follows. 18. The onus of p......
  • Get Started for Free