Yap Fook Cheong v Burkill (M) Sdn Bhd (1991) 1 MSCLC 90, 716;

JurisdictionMalaysia
Year1991
Date1991
CourtSupreme Court (Malaysia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 cases
2 books & journal articles
  • A REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN SELECTED AREAS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE1
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1996, December 1996
    • 1 d0 Dezembro d0 1996
    ...549—550. 9 This is the position in Malaysia, even though there are no words of subjection. See Yap Fook Cheong v Burkill (Malaya) Sdn Bhd[1991] 3 MLJ 160. 10 See O 53, r 1(1) (RC). 11 [1996] 1 SLR 609. 12 [1982] AC 617, at p 643. 13 Ibid, at p 616. 14 Ibid. 15 See McLardy v Slateum(1890) 24......
  • THE APPELLATE PROCESS: SOME ISSUES OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION IN DETERMINING ONE’S RIGHT TO APPEAL
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2000, December 2000
    • 1 d5 Dezembro d5 2000
    ...mesne profits, see Alagappa Chettiar v Coliseum Cafe[1962] 1 MLJ 111. 18 (1862) 15 Moo PCC 181. 19 (1956) 22 MLJ at 66. 20 49 IA 211. 21 [1991] 3 MLJ 160. This case was discussed earlier. 22 Ibid, at 162 to 163. 23 Ibid, at 163. See also, Sinnathamby v Lee Chooi Ying[1987] 1 MLJ 110, where ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT