UDA Holdings Bhd v Bisraya Construction Sdn Bhd

JurisdictionMalaysia
CourtHigh Court (Malaysia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
47 cases
3 firm's commentaries
  • CIPAA ' Is It To Have Retrospective Or Prospective Effect?
    • Malaysia
    • Mondaq Malaysia
    • 21 Diciembre 2020
    ...a significant period of time arising from the decisions in UDA Holdings Bhd v Bisraya Constructions Sdn Bhd & Anor and another case [2015] 11 MLJ 499, View Esteem Sdn Bhd v Bina Puri Holdings Bhd [2018] 2 MLJ 22 and Bauer (M) Sdn Bhd v Jack-In Pile (M) Sdn Bhd and another appeal [2018] ......
  • The Continuing Rise Of Statutory Adjudication In 2019
    • Malaysia
    • Mondaq Malaysia
    • 24 Noviembre 2020
    ...decision, the High Court relied on the legal proposition in UDA Holdings Bhd v Bisraya Construction Sdn Bhd & Anor and another case [2015] 11 MLJ 499 that CIPAA, including section 35, applied retrospectively to all construction contracts or disputes notwithstanding whether the construct......
  • Prospectivity Trumps Retrospectivity, And No, It's Not Fake News!
    • Malaysia
    • Mondaq Malaysia
    • 9 Abril 2020
    ...application of CIPAA first came to light in UDA Holdings Bhd v Bisraya Construction Sdn Bhd & Anor and Another Case [2015] 5 CLJ 527 ("UDA Holdings") where the High Court decided, inter alia, adjudication is nothing more than a dispute resolution mechanism and CIPAA essentiall......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT