Tuan Haji Ahmed Abdul Rahman v Arab Malaysian Finance Berhad
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Judgment Date | 1996 |
| Date | 1996 |
| Year | 1996 |
| Court | Federal Court (Malaysia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
179 cases
2 books & journal articles
-
A REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN SELECTED AREAS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE1
...an account was not ancillary to the claim for damages as reported in the judgment at p 142. Also see SCP, 1997, vol 1, para 13/6. 108 [1996] 1 MLJ 30. 109 Ibid, at p 36. 110 Ibid, at p 42. Applied by the Court of Appeal in Khor Cheng Wah v Sungai Way Leasing Sdn Bhd[1996] 1 MLJ 223, at p 22......
-
LAST FLIGHT OF THE EAGLE: NEW PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE SETTING ASIDE OF JUDGMENTS IN DEFAULT
...86 [2008] 4 SLR 907 at [33]—[34]. 87 [2008] 4 SLR 907 at [61]. 88 [2008] 4 SLR 907 at [35]. 89 Also see para 25 of this article. 90 [1996] 1 MLJ 30 at 42. 91 [2008] 4 SLR 907 at [24]. 92 [2008] 4 SLR 907 at [24]. 93 [2008] 4 SLR 907 at [27]. 94 See para 22 of this article. 95 [2003] SGHC 17......