Tengku Abdullah Ibni Sultan Abu Bakar and Others v Mohd Latiff Shah Mohd and Others & Other Appeals
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Judgment Date | 1996 |
| Date | 1996 |
| Year | 1996 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Malaysia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
80 cases
- Lee Hark Lam and Others v Kebun Rimau Sdn Bhd and Another
- Abdul Hamid Mahmood v Oriental Bank Berhad
- Paari Perumal v Abdul Majid Hj Nazardin and Others
- Solid Investments Ltd v Alcatel-Lucent (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (dahulu dikenali sebagai Alcatel Network Systems (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd)
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
VITIATING FACTORS IN CONTRACT LAW — THE INTERACTION OF THEORY AND PRACTICE
...209 [1994] 1 AC 180. 210 See generally Phang, supra, note 205 at 555—558. 211 Ibid at 557. 212 Ibid at 557—558. 213 See ibid at 558. 214 [1996] 2 MLJ 265. 215 Ibid at 309—310 (emphasis added). 216 [1994] 1 AC 180 at 195. 217 See ibid at 196—197. 218 See eg, Tjio, “New Cases applying O’Brien......
-
UNDUE INFLUENCE, UNCONSCIONABILITY AND GOOD FAITH
...area of law. It has been accepted by the Malaysian Court of Appeal in Tengku Abdullah ibni Sultan Abu Bakar v Mohd Latiff bin Shar Mohd[1996] 2 MLJ 265 at 315—6. Cheong Kim Hock is also authority for the proposition that a director can be presumed to have exercised undue influence over his ......