Tan Tek Seng v Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Pendidikan and Another

JurisdictionMalaysia
CourtCourt of Appeal (Malaysia)
Judgment Date1996
Year1996
Date1996

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
200 cases
7 books & journal articles
  • WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN SINGAPORE: THE LEGAL CHALLENGE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1999, December 1999
    • 1 December 1999
    ...which the crime has had on her: Peter Low, “Empowering Victims via VIS”, The Singapore Law Gazette, August 1997 at 27. 34 1992 Ed. 35 [1996] 1 MLJ 261 (CA, Kuala Lumpur). 36 Ibid at 288. 37 Ibid at 287, citing Bandhua Mukti Morcha v Union of IndiaAIR 1984 SC 802 (SC, India). 38 Ibid at 288.......
  • COMPARATIVE ORIGINALISM IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION IN ASIA
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2017, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...(Douglas Greenberg et al eds) (Oxford University Press, 1993) at pp 65, 68 and 72. 35 Tan Tek Seng v Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Pendidikan [1996] 1 MLJ 261 at 288; see also Sukma Darmawan Sasmitaat Madja v Ketua Pengarah Penjara Malaysia[1999] 1 MLJ 266 at 271: “the Federal Constitution, unli......
  • Procedure and Remedies in Judicial Review: A Malaysian Perspective
    • South Africa
    • Juta Acta Juridica No. , August 2019
    • 15 August 2019
    ...Chief Police Off‌icer Perak v Ramesh [2001] 1 MLJ 161.41At 165.42[1979] 2 MLJ 33.43Means ‘The Education Service Commission’ in English.44[1996] 1 MLJ 261.45At 288.365PROCEDURE AND REMEDIES IN JUDICIAL REVIEW© Juta and Company (Pty) Then in Sugumar Balakrishnan v Pengarah Imigresen Negeri Sa......
  • Administrative and Constitutional Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2007, December 2007
    • 1 December 2007
    ...as a panacea for heroin addicts (at [23]). Counsel invoked the Malaysian case of Tan Teck Seng v Suruhanjaya Perhidmatan Pendidikan[1996] 1 MLJ 261 where the Court of Appeal held that legislation which contravened the Malaysian equivalent of Singapore”s Art 9(1) might be struck down ‘if an ......
  • Get Started for Free