Tam Tai Ying v Tey Hoe & 3 Ors
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Year | 2019 |
| Court | High Court (Malaysia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
CHANG PENG SOON vs SIM AH MOW
...to be acted on by the person to whom it was made and which was in fact so acted on. held that…” [60] In TAM TAI YING V TEY HOE & 3 ORS [2019] 6 AMR 387 the High Court held “The conditions–precedent of Sections 91 and 92 Evidence Act 1950 are that: (1) A document was drawn to State a particu......
-
CHANDRAMOGAN A/L MANOGARAN vs KONG WAI SENG
...termasuk keterangan dari kesaksian senyap (silent witness) iaitu pelan lakar dan saksi bebas.” [69] In TAM TAI YING V. TEY HOE & 3 ORS [2019] 6 AMR 387, the High Court succinctly puts it in the following “…. (3) Oral Evidence cannot be led to contradict such a document as documents are some......
-
ROXY HERITAGE FURNITURE MANUFACTURER SDN BHD ,ROXY HERITAGE FURNITURE EXPORTER SDN BHD vs NCS WOOD PRODUCTS SDN. BHD.
...Commissioner Awang Armadajaya bin i) |JB-12ANCC-2-07 /2020 & JB-12ANCC-3-07/2020) In TAM TAI YING V TEY HOE & 3 ORS December 28, 2020 [2019] 6 AMR 387, the High ruled that [21] | find that the Sale and Purchase Agreement (P1) was indeed signed by both parties in 1996, and henceforth transfe......
-
LEE BOON SIONGMariamah Barathan vs Andrew TanGREAT EASTERN LIFE ASSURANCE (MALAYSIA) BERHAD
...law and policy. The Court can only read and interpret the contract within the 4 walls of the contract In TAM TAI YING V TEY HOE & 3 ORS [2019] 6 AMR 387, the High Court discussed the terms of a contract between parties and held, inter [501 Further, it is the considered view of this court th......