Re A Solicitor. 3 MC 323

JurisdictionMalaysia
Date1962
Year1962
CourtUnspecified court (Malaysia)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 cases
  • Law Society of Singapore v Rasif David
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 30 Enero 2008
    ...SLR 132 (folld) Narindar Singh Kang v Law Society of Singapore [2007] 4 SLR (R) 641; [2007] 4 SLR 641 (refd) Solicitor, In re A (1962) 3 MC 323 (refd) Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 1985 Rev Ed)ss 82 (1),82 (2) Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2001 Rev Ed)ss 83 (2) (b), 85 (2) (consd);ss 83,8......
  • Law Society of Singapore v Tan Sok Ling
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 23 Marzo 2007
    ...all solicitors must observe as a condition for their privilege to practise. We find an observation of Thomson CJ in In re A Solicitor (1962) 3 MC 323 at 323 apposite: The legal profession enjoys very great privileges. In return for these privileges they owe the public a duty and that duty i......
  • Law Society of Singapore v Uthayasurian Sidambaram
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 13 Agosto 2009
    ...regard to the management of client accounts, it was observed by Thomson CJ in the Malaysian High Court decision of In re A Solicitor (1962) 3 MC 323 at 323 The legal profession enjoys very great privileges. In return for these privileges they owe the public a duty and that duty involves not......
  • Law Society of Singapore v Tay Eng Kwee Edwin
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 30 Julio 2007
    ...266; [1999] 1 SLR 696 (refd) Law Society of Singapore v Tan Sok Ling [2007] 2 SLR (R) 945; [2007] 2 SLR 945 (distd) Solicitor, In re A (1962) 3 MC 323 (refd) Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2001 Rev Ed)s 83 (2) (b) (consd);ss 72,74, 83,83 (2) (j), 94,98, 98 (2),First Schedulepara 1 (1) (c) L......
  • Get Started for Free