Public Prosecutor v Thong Kian Oon
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Year | 2012 |
| Court | High Court (Malaysia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
- Public Prosecutor v Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd & 8 Ors
- HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad v Jejak Maju Resources Sdn Bhd
-
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR vs MOKBUL HOSSAIN
...requires proper proof of relevant facts which in turn must be supported by admissible evidence (Refer PP v. 20 Thong Kian Oon & Ors [2012] 8 CLJ 119). This is to enable the court to arrive at a correct decision since the court is not merely exercising a ministerial or executive character wh......
-
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR vs KUALA DIMENSI SDN BHD
...AMLATFA requires proper proof of relevant facts which in turn must be supported by admissible evidence (Refer PP v. Thong Kian Oon & Ors [2012] 8 CLJ 119). This is to enable the court to arrive at a correct decision since the court is not merely exercising a ministerial or executive charact......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
An analysis of the forfeiture regime under the anti-money laundering law
...to seizure orders, the constitutionality of forfeiture orders cannot be challenged.In Public Prosecutor vThongKian Oon and Ors (2012) 10 MLJ 140, the High Court stated asfollows:The learned counsel argued that s 56 of the Act is inconsistent with art 13 of the FederalConstitution and theref......
-
An analysis of the forfeiture regime under the anti-money laundering law
...to seizure orders, the constitutionality of forfeiture orders cannot be challenged.In Public Prosecutor vThongKian Oon and Ors (2012) 10 MLJ 140, the High Court stated asfollows:The learned counsel argued that s 56 of the Act is inconsistent with art 13 of the FederalConstitution and theref......
-
Money laundering and civil forfeiture regime: Malaysian experience
...or to imprisonment for a termnot exceeding ve years or to both (AMLATFA, 2001,s.4).In Public Prosecutor v. Thong Kian Oon & 4Ors [2012] 5 AMR 444, there was an orderof forfeiture of the properties that were seized from the respondents. Except for the rsttwo respondents, it is noted that t......