PP (Wong Ee Tong as surety); Yap Yin Kok
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Court | High Court (Malaysia) |
| Year | 1988 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
- Aone v Public Prosecutor
-
Public Prosecutor v Eyu Siew Hwa
...why the entire amount of $100,000 should not be forfeited. There was no excuse at all. [Yap Yin Kok v Public Prosecutor [1987] SLR 438, [1988] 1 MLJ 237, Chan Sek Keong Bail amount from his savings and loans 16 In short, the surety was saying that he could not afford to have the entire sum ......
-
Ong Foo Keow v Public Prosecutor
...that her business was poor. This has no mitigating value. 10 Mr Chan Sek Keong (then a Judicial Commissioner) in Yap Kin Kok v PP [1988]1 MLJ 237 quoted Donald LJ in R v Waltham Forest Justices, ex p Parfrey [1980] Cr LR 571 “There is an obligation on a surety to be fully satisfied that he ......
-
Murugaiyan Sangamalam v Public Prosecutor
...voluntarily. (See paragraph 3 of the said document.) 10. Chan Sek Keong JC (as he then was) had held in Yap Kin Kok v. Public Prosecutor [1988] 1 MLJ 237 that "A surety bond is no different from a guarantee given in a civil contract…. Therefore ordinary principles of construction apply in t......
