PP lwn Taiko Fertiliser & Yang Lain

JurisdictionMalaysia
Judgment Date2019
Year2019
Date2019
CourtCourt of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • PUBLIC PROSECUTOR vs SARAWAK UNITED PEOPLE’S PARTY
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • 28 October 2020
    ...regard, His Lordship Ab Karim Ab Jalil JCA in delivering the judgment of the Court of Appeal in PP lwn Taiko 29 Fertiliser & Yang Lain [2019] 4 CLJ 480 CA; [2019] MLJU [2019] MLRAU 36, held, inter alia, as follows: “(1) Based on the provisions of ss. 56(1) and 61(2) of the AMLATFPUA, it is ......
  • PUBLIC PROSECUTORPUBLIC PROSECUTOR vs KASITAH BIN GADDAMKASITAH BIN GADDAM
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 28 September 2020
    ...the Gazette vide P.U.(B) 12719/2019. This mandatory requirement has thus been fulfilled. (See: PP lwn. Taiko Fertiliser & Yang Lain [2019] 4 CLJ 480 CA; MLJU 88; [2019] MLRAU 36). After the third party notice was 29 published in the Gazette, no third party came forward to stake any claim ag......
  • Public Prosecutor vs Barisan Nasional Bahagian Johor Bahru, 05-08-2020
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 5 August 2020
    ...the property to show cause why the property should not be forfeited, must first be satisfied. (See: PP lwn. Taiko Fertiliser & Yang Lain [2019] 4 CLJ 480 CA; [2019] MLJU 88; [2019] MLRAU Nature of forfeiture proceedings [44] The nature of a particular proceedings is not determined solely on......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT