Pathmanabhan Nalliannen v PP

JurisdictionMalaysia
CourtCourt of Appeal (Malaysia)
Date2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Pendakwa Raya v Hare Krishnan a/l K Subramaniam & 3 Ors
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • ANTARA MASIH PERVIAZ (W/PAKISTAN) vs PENDAKWA RAYA, 01-22-2022
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • 22 January 2022
    ...entitled to accept such opinion unless there is in rebuttal an opinion of another expert (Pathmanabhan Nalliannen v PP & Other Appeals [2016] 1 CLJ 377). In the present case, the trial judge had accepted SP1 evidence thus, no issue In the Federal Court case of Hasbala Mohd Sarong PP [2013] ......
  • PUBLIC PROSECUTOR vs ABDUL RAHMAN HAERUDDIN, 05-04-2021
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 4 May 2021
    ...weighing whether its 700 prejudicial effect outweighs its probative value. The case of Pathmanabhan a/l Nalliannen v Public Prosecutor [2016] 1 MLJ 609 was further cited as support to contend that what is material is whether the information given fulfils the requirement under Section 27 of ......
  • Public Prosecutor v Anandan A/L Vijaya Kumar, 05-04-2019
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 5 April 2019
    ...As such, this Court is unable to accede to the request of the prosecution. Reference is made to the case of Pathmanaban Nalliannen v PP [2016] 1 CLJ 377 which reiterated that the trial court is the determiner of a witness’s credibility as it had the audio– visual advantage of assessing the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT