Pathmanabhan Nalliannen v PP
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Malaysia) |
| Date | 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
- Pendakwa Raya v Hare Krishnan a/l K Subramaniam & 3 Ors
-
ANTARA MASIH PERVIAZ (W/PAKISTAN) vs PENDAKWA RAYA, 01-22-2022
...entitled to accept such opinion unless there is in rebuttal an opinion of another expert (Pathmanabhan Nalliannen v PP & Other Appeals [2016] 1 CLJ 377). In the present case, the trial judge had accepted SP1 evidence thus, no issue In the Federal Court case of Hasbala Mohd Sarong PP [2013] ......
-
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR vs ABDUL RAHMAN HAERUDDIN, 05-04-2021
...weighing whether its 700 prejudicial effect outweighs its probative value. The case of Pathmanabhan a/l Nalliannen v Public Prosecutor [2016] 1 MLJ 609 was further cited as support to contend that what is material is whether the information given fulfils the requirement under Section 27 of ......
-
Public Prosecutor v Anandan A/L Vijaya Kumar, 05-04-2019
...As such, this Court is unable to accede to the request of the prosecution. Reference is made to the case of Pathmanaban Nalliannen v PP [2016] 1 CLJ 377 which reiterated that the trial court is the determiner of a witness’s credibility as it had the audio– visual advantage of assessing the ......