Pacific Inter-Link Sdn Bhd v Wilmar Trading Pte Ltd

JurisdictionMalaysia
CourtHigh Court (Malaysia)
Year2013

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 cases
  • Tan Poh Yee v Tan Boon Thien & Other Appeals
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • PERRIN DILEEN RODRIGUES vs PERRY DANNY RODRIGUES
    • Malaysia
    • Session Court (Malaysia)
    • 25 November 2021
    ...to supplement the same. As Lim Yee Lan J (later JCA) tersely put it in Pacific Inter-Link Sdn Bhd v. Wilmar Trading Pte Ltd & Ors [2013] 7 CLJ 312: “Firstly, it is the duty of the plaintiff when filing such a huge amount of claim against the defendants to ensure that all material facts and ......
  • COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS MALAYSIA SDN BHD vs LEESING SALES & MARKETING SDN BHD
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 17 November 2020
    ...Bhd v ICI Paints (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd & Anor [2010] AMEJ 0700; [2011] 6 CLJ 911; Pacific Inter-Link Sdn Bhd v Wilmar Trading Pte Ltd & Ors [2013] 7 CLJ 312; [2012] 1 LNS 1263); (b) the other side is not taken by surprise at the trial (Spedding v Fitzpatrick (1888) 38 ChD 410 at 413; Lim Kee T......
  • Ma-A52-12-11-2021 Goj
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 March 2023
    ...cause of action for conspiracy by lawful means have not been pleaded [See: Pacific Inter-Link Sdn Bhd v. Wilmar Trading Pte Ltd & Ors [2013] 7 CLJ 312 per Lim Yee Lan J (as she then was)]” [19] Berdasarkan perkara yang di atas, Mahkamah ini memutuskan bahawa Plaintif-Plaintif telah gagal un......