Navaratnam v PP

JurisdictionMalaysia
Judgment Date1973
Date1973
CourtFederal Court (Malaysia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Ooi Meng Sua v Public Prosecutor
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2009
  • Public Prosecutor v Tan Kim Hock Anthony
    • Singapore
    • District Court (Singapore)
    • 14 June 2013
    ...clerk. He was not liable for CBT even though he had been "grossly careless". Another more extreme example is provided by Navaratnam v PP [1973] 1 MLJ 154 . In that case, the officer in charge of a prison was found to have taken money belonging to a prisoner whose belongings had been entrust......
  • Public Prosecutor v Muthukumaran Ramaiyan
    • Singapore
    • District Court (Singapore)
    • 20 August 2014
    ...clerk. He was not liable for CBT even though he had been "grossly careless". Another more extreme example is provided by Navaratnam v PP [1973] 1 MLJ 154 . … 41 Similarly, in Rangi Lall v King-Emperor (1930) 6 ILR 68, the court commented on the importance of proving "dishonesty" beyond reas......
  • Public Prosecutor v Kao Che Jen
    • Malaysia
    • Magistrates Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2015
    ...or as prescribed by law and he desired the commission of such 12 an offence or doing of such a forbidden act. 13 14 Nevaratnam v PP [1973] 1 MLJ 154 the Federal Court held that, inter “on the question of dishonest intention, we can do no better 17 than quote passage from the Judgment of Faz......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT