Navaratnam v PP
Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
Judgment Date | 1973 |
Date | 1973 |
Court | Federal Court (Malaysia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
- Ooi Meng Sua v Public Prosecutor
-
Public Prosecutor v Tan Kim Hock Anthony
...clerk. He was not liable for CBT even though he had been "grossly careless". Another more extreme example is provided by Navaratnam v PP [1973] 1 MLJ 154 . In that case, the officer in charge of a prison was found to have taken money belonging to a prisoner whose belongings had been entrust......
-
Public Prosecutor v Muthukumaran Ramaiyan
...clerk. He was not liable for CBT even though he had been "grossly careless". Another more extreme example is provided by Navaratnam v PP [1973] 1 MLJ 154 . … 41 Similarly, in Rangi Lall v King-Emperor (1930) 6 ILR 68, the court commented on the importance of proving "dishonesty" beyond reas......
-
Public Prosecutor v Kao Che Jen
...or as prescribed by law and he desired the commission of such 12 an offence or doing of such a forbidden act. 13 14 Nevaratnam v PP [1973] 1 MLJ 154 the Federal Court held that, inter “on the question of dishonest intention, we can do no better 17 than quote passage from the Judgment of Faz......