Mandarin Video Holdings Sdn Bhd; Television Broadcasts Ltd and Others

JurisdictionMalaysia
Year1983
CourtHigh Court (Malaysia)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 cases
4 books & journal articles
  • INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW IN SINGAPORE: A GENERAL OVERVIEW1
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1992, December 1992
    • 1 December 1992
    ...place within a period of not more than 30 days of each other. See also Television Broadcast Ltd. v. Mandarin Video Holdings Sdn. Bhd. [1983] 2 M.L.J. 346. 63“Qualified person” is defined in section 81 of the Act as “(a) a citizen of Singapore, or an individual resident in Singapore; or (b) ......
  • CONTROL OF THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE ORDER†
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1994, December 1994
    • 1 December 1994
    ...against the injury in respect of which complaint is made.” 3 per Chan J. in Television Broadcasts Ltd v Mandarin Video Holdings Sdn Bhd[1983] 2 M.L.J. 346 at p. 350. 4 [1976] 1 Ch. 55 5 Specifically, United Company of Merchants of England, trading to the East Indies v Kynaston[1821] 3 Bli.(......
  • EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT OF COPYRIGHT
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1990, December 1990
    • 1 December 1990
    ...40 Section 120(b) of the Singapore Copyright Act. 41 [1986] 3 ALL ER 338 at p. 367. 42 [1981] 2 ALL ER 76. 43 [1984] 1 NZLR 461. 44 [1983] 2 MLJ 346. 45 [1985] 1 MLJ 86. 46 [1986] 2 MLJ 400. 47 See Mavera Compania Naviera SA v International Bulk Carriers SA[1980] ALL ER 213; Third Chandris ......
  • Privilege Against Self-Incrimination
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1989, December - January 1989
    • 1 December 1989
    ...in proceedings relating to infringement of intellectual property rights. 1. [1989] 2 MLJ 400. 2. [1981] 2 AER 76. 3. [1982] FSR 161. 4. [1983] 2 MLJ 346. 5. [1985] 1 MLJ 86. 6. In an article entitled “The Anton Piller Order”[1985] 2 MLJ cxxxvii, I suggested that in principle, it is difficul......