Kuppusamy Berapans v Anggamah Ramasamy and Another
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Year | 1991 |
| Court | High Court (Malaysia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
- HLG Credit Sdn Bhd v Chan Teik Huat
-
PANNIR SELVAM A/L SINNAIYAH
...the express purpose does not correspond with the true purpose’: Berapans v Anggamah per Lim Beng Ramasamy Choon J in Kuppusamy & Anor [1991] 3 CLJ (Rep) 97, where he adopted the explanation by Diplock LJ in Snook v. London and West Riding Investments Ltd. [1967] 2 QB 786 [34] In order to de......
-
Ang Boon Hengngai Fong Lan (P) v Li Chee Loongdavid Leow, 27-10-2018
...the plaintiffs had also contended that the impugned SPA was a sham agreement. In Kuppusamy Berapans v Anggamah Ramasamy & Anor [1991] 3 CLJ (Rep) 97, at p. 110, it was stated “Sham has been explained as “a false label in which the express purpose does not correspond with the true purpose.” ......