Lo Khi on (t/a Fuji Hairdressing Saloon) v Tanjong Aru Hotel Sdn Bhd

JurisdictionMalaysia
Year1994
CourtHigh Court (Malaysia)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 cases
  • Uvh v Uvj
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 3 Junio 2019
    ...[2017] SGHC 90 (refd) Libertarian Investments Ltd v Thomas Alexej Hall [2013] HKCFA 93 (refd) Lo Khi On v Tanjong Aru Hotel Sdn Bhd [1994] 3 MLJ 766 (refd) Mona Computer Systems (S) Pte Ltd v Singaravelu Murugan [2014] 1 SLR 847 (folld) Murad v Al-Saraj [2005] EWCA Civ 959 (refd) Sandz Solu......
  • Karintina Trading Pte Ltd v Cornelder'S (Sabah) Sdn. Bhd., 20-03-1995
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 20 Marzo 1995
    ...the nominal sum of RMl.00 since a wrong, though no loss, has been established. (Lo Khi On v Tanjong Aro Hotel Sdn Bhd [1994] 4 CLJ 550; [1994] 3 MLJ 766). Karintina is also awarded costs to be taxed and be paid by Cornelder. This is the reason why I chose to approach the issue of damages in......