JRI Resources Sdn Bhd v Kuwait Finance House (M) Bhd (President of Association of Islamic Banking Institutions Malaysia and Another, interveners)
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Judgment Date | 2019 |
| Year | 2019 |
| Date | 2019 |
| Court | Federal Court (Malaysia) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
21 cases
3 books & journal articles
-
BETWEEN TWO SHORES
...Indira Gandhi a/p Mutho v Pengarah Jabatan Agama Islam Perak [2018] 1 MLJ 545; [2018] 2 AMR 313. 126 Act 351. 127 [2017] 3 MLJ 561. 128 [2019] 3 MLJ 561; [2019] MLJU 275. 129 Act 701. 130 Reliance was placed on Peguam Negara Malaysia v Chin Chee Kow [2019] 3 MLJ 443; [2019] MLJU 202. 131 Se......
-
THE COURTS AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
...however, declined four to one to exercise its power of review: TR Sandah ak Tabau v Director of Forest, Sarawak [2019] 6 MLJ 141. 131 [2019] 3 MLJ 561. 132 Act 701. 133 Since the writing of the article, the Pakatan Harapan government has lost power due to a change of allegiance from members......
-
THIRTY-FIVE YEARS OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY ADJUDICATING ISLAMIC FINANCE MATTERS
...Meng v CIMB Islamic Bank Bhd [2015] 5 CLJ 324 at [32]. 89 Low Chin Meng v CIMB Islamic Bank Bhd [2015] 5 CLJ 324 at [34]. 90 [2019] 5 CLJ 569; [2019] 3 MLJ 561 . It is noted that the Malayan Law Journal and the Current Law Journal (“ CLJ ”) have different styles of organising the s......