Jambri Abd Hamid v Public Prosecutor

JurisdictionMalaysia
Year2009
CourtHigh Court (Malaysia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 cases
  • Cindyong
    • Malaysia
    • Magistrates Court (Malaysia)
    • March 1, 2023
    ...4 MLJ 210, PP v Balveer Singh a/l Mahindar Singh [2009] 1 MLJ 386, Sahari bin Masrom v PP [2009] 2 MLJ 859, Jambri bin Abd Hamid v PP [2009] 9 MLJ 683, and Datuk Nur Jazlan Bin Tan Sri Mohamed & Ors V T Gopala Krishnan [2017] 1 LNS 402, that the following common law rules pertaining to a ta......
  • RAMANESH RAMOO A/L RAMOO vs 23 MOTORS SDN BHD (Company No: 1161413-H)
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • November 9, 2021
    ...Mahindar Singh [2009] 1 MLJ 386, Sahari bin Masrom v PP [2009] 2 MLJ 859, and Jambri bin Abd Hamid v PP [2009] 9 MLJ 683, and Datuk Nur Jazlan Bin Tan Sri Mohamed & Ors V T Gopala Krishnan [2017] 1 LNS 402, that the following common law rules pertaining to a tape recording are applicable be......