Jack-in-Pile (M) Sdn Bhd v Bauer (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (and Another Appeal)

JurisdictionMalaysia
Judgment Date2019
Date2019
Year2019
CourtFederal Court (Malaysia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • KLIAA-KLIAC Consortium & 2 Ors v Latipah binti Abu t/a LA Architect
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2020
  • Lion Pacific Sdn Bhd v Pestech Technology Sdn Bhd and Another Appeal
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2022
  • Ap Datin Seri Rosmah Mansur
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 March 2023
    ...Zubair Hj Murshid v PP [2014] 9 CLJ 289 (Mahkamah Persekutuan); JackIn Pile (M) Sdn Bhd v. Bauer (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd & Another Appeal [2020] 1 CLJ 299 (Mahkamah Persekutuan); Dan Dalam perkara Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib Bin Hj Abdul Razak v. Pendakwa Raya [Mahkamah Persekutuan Rayuan Jenayah No: 0......
  • UDA LAND SDN BHD vs PUNCAK SEPAKAT SDN BHD
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 16 June 2020
    ...the Contract was made before the enforcement of the CIPAA, see Jack-In Pile (M) Sdn Bhd v Bauer (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd & Another Appeal [2020] 1 CLJ 299. 29 [43] In view of the aforementioned triple grave errors committed by the learned Arbitrator, I find that he had committed a fundamental den......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
  • Construction Comparative Guide
    • Malaysia
    • Mondaq Malaysia
    • 24 January 2022
    ...cases which have had an impact on the construction industry include the following: Jack-in-Pile (M) Sdn Bhd v Bauer (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd [2020] 1 CLJ 299, heard together with Ireka Engineering & Construction Sdn Bhd v PWC Corporation Sdn Bhd [2020] 1 CLJ 193: The Federal Court held that CIPAA......
  • Construction Comparative Guide
    • Malaysia
    • Mondaq Malaysia
    • 24 January 2022
    ...cases which have had an impact on the construction industry include the following: Jack-in-Pile (M) Sdn Bhd v Bauer (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd [2020] 1 CLJ 299, heard together with Ireka Engineering & Construction Sdn Bhd v PWC Corporation Sdn Bhd [2020] 1 CLJ 193: The Federal Court held that CIPAA......
  • The Continuing Rise Of Statutory Adjudication In 2019
    • Malaysia
    • Mondaq Malaysia
    • 24 November 2020
    ...EFFECT OF CIPAA Top of the charts, the noteworthy saga of appeals of Jack-In Pile (M) Sdn Bhd v Bauer (M) Sdn Bhd and another appeal [2020] 1 MLJ 174 ("Jack-In Pile") and Ireka Engineering & Construction Sdn Bhd v PWC Corp Sdn Bhd and other appeals [2020] 1 MLJ 311 ("Ireka") marked the begi......
  • Prospectivity Trumps Retrospectivity, And No, It's Not Fake News!
    • Malaysia
    • Mondaq Malaysia
    • 9 April 2020
    ...Prior to the decisions of the Federal Court ("FC") in Jack-In Pile (M) Sdn Bhd v Bauer (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (and Another Appeal) [2019] 7 AMR 348 ("Bauer") and Ireka Engineering & Construction Sdn Bhd v PWC Corporation Sdn Bhd (and 2 Other Appeals) [2019] 7 AMR 309 ("Ireka"), there was a ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT