Hasrat Usaha Sdn Bhd v Pati Sdn Bhd
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Judgment Date | 2011 |
| Date | 2011 |
| Year | 2011 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Malaysia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
IN & ON ID SDN BHD vs LYC MOTHER & CHILD CENTRE SDN BHD
...Enterprise Sdn Bhd [2009] 1 MLJ 36; Vithal Kumar a/l Jayaraman v Azman bin Md Nor [2010] 2 MLJ 67; Hasrat Usaha Sdn Bhd v Pati Sdn Bhd [2011] 3 MLJ 343; Alex Nandaseri De Silva v. Sarath Wickrama Surendre [2013] 10 CLJ 52; Yam Kong Seng & Anor v Yee Weng Kai [2014] 4 MLJ 478; and Vasanthi a......
-
Mycitydeal Ltd v Villas International Property Pte Ltd
...some of the facts (see Singapore Civil Procedure 2013 at para 27/3/2, citing the Malaysian case of Hasrat Usaha Sdn Bhd v Pati Sdn Bhd [2011] 3 MLJ 343 at [37]). In other words, the effect of the admissions must be, as succinctly stated by GP Selvam J in Shunmugam Jayakumar and others v Jey......
-
MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD vs KUMPULAN LIZIZ SDN BHD
...Realty Sdn Bhd [2003] 3 CLJ 129; RHB Bank Bhd v. Wembley Industries Holdings Bhd [2012] 1 LNS 955; Hasrat Usaha Sdn Bhd v. Pati Sdn Bhd [2011] 2 CLJ 863; Metroplex Holdings Sdn Bhd v. Commerce International Merchant Bankers Bhd [2013] 8 CLJ 329; and Affin Bank Bhd v. Successcom Enterprise S......
-
Mycitydeal Ltd (trading as Groupon UK) and others v Villas International Property Pte Ltd and others
...some of the facts (see Singapore Civil Procedure 2013 at para 27/3/2, citing the Malaysian case of Hasrat Usaha Sdn Bhd v Pati Sdn Bhd [2011] 3 MLJ 343 at [37]). In other words, the effect of the admissions must be, as succinctly stated by GP Selvam J in Shunmugam Jayakumar and others v Jey......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Civil Procedure
...the cause of action and not merely evidence of some of the facts [emphasis in original]: see also Hasrat Usaha Sdn Bhd v Pati Sdn Bhd[2011] 3 MLJ 343 at [37], cited in mycitydeal at [69]. A party needs to be careful before relying on an admission under O 27 r 3 because if a statement of fac......