Hanhyo Sdn Bhd v Marplan Sdn Bhd and Others
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Court | High Court (Malaysia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
- Chan Guan Seng dan satu lagi v Gale Force Sdn Bhd (Malayan Banking Bhd, Pihak Ketiga)
- Punj Llyod Oil & Gas (M) v Etiqa Insurance Bhd
- Punj Lloyd Oil & Gas (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v Etiqa Insurance Berhad and Others
-
Alasan Penghakiman Wa-28Ncc-173-03-2016 Tan Poh Lee v Tan Kim Choo Holdings Sdn Bhd Another
...and reasonably entitled”. [27] Lim Beng Choon J explained the ambit of the injustice in Hanhyo Sdn. Bhd. v. Marplan Sdn. Bhd & Ors. [1992] 1 MLJ 51 at p 63,64; 2 CLJ (Rep) 684, as follows: “The Court would not compel a plaintiff to continue his action against a defendant if he does not want......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
AUTOMATIC DISCONTINUANCE UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 2 — FIRST DORMANT, THEN DEAD…
...which is inconsistent with his application to dismiss the action for want of prosecution. 42 [1981] AC 557. 43 [1977] 2 All ER 591. 44 [1992] 1 MLJ 51. 45 [1984] 3 NSWLR 486. 46 [1971] 2 MLJ 124. 47 [1996] 1 WLR 561. 48 However, the defendant can apply for a subsequent action (on the same c......