Government of Malaysia v Lim Kit Siang & United Engineers (M) Bhd v Lim Kit Siang
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Judgment Date | 1988 |
| Date | 1988 |
| Year | 1988 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Malaysia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
238 cases
1 firm's commentaries
-
Is Public Interest Litigation Becoming More Prevalent In Malaysia?
...Rome-Italy, Vol 7 No 2 March 2016, pp. 115. Ibid. Government of Malaysia v Lim Kit Siang United Engineers (M) Berhad v Lim Kit Siang [1988] 2 MLJ 12. Order 53 Rule 2(4), Rules of Court Malaysian Trade Union Congress & Ors v Menteri Tenaga, Air dan Komunikasi & Anor [2014] 3 MLJ 145. Malik B......
7 books & journal articles
-
THE COURTS AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
...v Narendra Dadhiah AIR 1999 SC 3211. Cited with approval in QSR Brands Bhd v Suruhanjaya Sekuriti [2006] 3 MLJ 164; [2006] 2 CLJ 530. 23 [1988] 2 MLJ 12. 24 Government of Malaysia v Lim Kit Siang [1988] 2 MLJ 12 at 45. 25 [2006] 3 MLJ 164; [2006] 2 CLJ 532. 26 QSR Brands Bhd v Suruhanjaya S......
-
Administrative and Constitutional Law
...v AG took note of the more liberal English standing rules and the Malaysian test as established in Government of Malaysia v Lim Kit Siang[1988] 2 MLJ 12 (‘Lim Kit Siang’). A Member of Parliament sought a declaration that a letter of intent issued by the Malaysian government given to a compa......
-
A REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN SELECTED AREAS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE1
...position. See Lim Kit Siang v Pemangku Ketua Polis Daerah, Butterworth[1988] 2 MLJ 648, at p 650; Government of Malaysia v Lim Kit Siang[1988] 2 MLJ 12, at p 19. 161 [1892] 3 Ch D 274, at p 277. 162 This principle would encompass a claim for a remedy which the court is not empowered to gran......
-
Procedure and Remedies in Judicial Review: A Malaysian Perspective
...question of locus standi. We need only say that on the facts of this case theappellant clearly has locus standi to bring this suit.16[1988] 2 MLJ 12.17Reproduced from the judgment of the High Court reported in [1988] 1 MLJ 50.356 COMPARING ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE ACROSS THE COMMONWEALTH© Jut......
Request a trial to view additional results