Goh Yoke v PP

JurisdictionMalaysia
Date1970
CourtFederal Court (Malaysia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
25 cases
2 books & journal articles
  • Rationalising the burden of establishing defences at criminal law in Singapore: Reconsidering Jayasena, in the wake of Eu Lim Hoklai
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 21-4, October 2017
    • 1 octobre 2017
    ...Juraimi Husin v Public Prosecutor [1998] 1 MLJ 537; Public Prosecutor v Misbah bin Saat [1997] 3 MLJ 495; Goh Yoke v Public Prosecutor [1970] 1 MLJ 63; Jusoh v PublicProsecutor [1963] MLJ 59. R v Stokes (1848) 3 C and K 183 at 188 per Rolfe B, as well as R v Perry (1919) 14 Cr App R 48 at 5......
  • THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE1
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1992, December 1992
    • 1 décembre 1992
    ...on the same footing as all other defences. The same rule must apply. It was so held in a decision of the Federal Court in Goh Yoke v. W[1970] 1 M.L.J. 63, at p.66, which was decided shortly before Jayasena. Ong Hock Thye CJ (Malaya) said: … the evidence as a whole must be sufficient to excl......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT