Foo Fio Na v Dr Soo Fook Mun
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Court | Federal Court (Malaysia) |
| Judgment Date | 2007 |
| Date | 2007 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
79 cases
3 firm's commentaries
-
Robots To The Rescue: Regulation Of Artificial Intelligence In Healthcare In Malaysia
...the test laid down in Rogers v Whitaker [1992] HCA 58, as adopted by the Malaysian Federal Court in Foo Fio Na v Dr. Soo Fook Mun & Anor [2007] 1 MLJ 593. 27 see Paul Sankey, "AI Medical Diagnosis and Liability When Something Goes Wrong." (Enable Law, 24th February 28 Ibid. The content of t......
-
Robots To The Rescue: Regulation Of Artificial Intelligence In Healthcare In Malaysia
...the test laid down in Rogers v Whitaker [1992] HCA 58, as adopted by the Malaysian Federal Court in Foo Fio Na v Dr. Soo Fook Mun & Anor [2007] 1 MLJ 593. 27 see Paul Sankey, "AI Medical Diagnosis and Liability When Something Goes Wrong." (Enable Law, 24th February 28 Ibid. The content of t......
-
Approach To Medical Negligence Claims By Malaysian Courts
...& Anor The Federal Court, the apex court in Malaysia, on 29/12/06 in its judgment in the case of Foo Fio Na v Dr. Soo Fook Mun & Anor [2007] 1 MLJ 593 declared inter alia, the Bolam Test which has been the basis in determining the standard of care in medical negligence cases in Malaysia sin......
2 books & journal articles
-
MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE AND PATIENT AUTONOMY
...the following:66 The plaintiffs quite rightly rely on the recent decision of the Federal Court in Foo Fio Na v Dr Soo Fook Mun & Anor[2007] 1 MLJ 593. In that case, the Federal Court held that the standard of care that a medical attendant should exercise is now a question which is for the u......
-
THE PROTECTION OF PERSONAL INTERESTS
...the UK under Montgomery. (A similar approach is taken in Malaysia, under the decision of the Federal Court in Foo Fio Na v Dr Soo Fook Mu[2007] 1 MLJ 593). Notably (as discussed at paras 13-15 below), even before Montgomery there had been a paradigm shift in the philosophy of the UK courts,......