Enactment No.10 of 1922, The Judgments (Reciprocity) Enactment; Ho Hong Bank Ltd v Ho Kai Neo
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Judgment Date | 1932 |
| Year | 1932 |
| Date | 1932 |
| Court | Unspecified court (Malaysia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Malaysia Marine ABD Heavy Engineering Sdn Bhd v VLK Traders Singapore Pte Ltd
...SLR 436 (refd) DHL Global Forwarding (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v Mactus (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd [2013] 4 SLR 781 (refd) Ho Hong Bank Ltd v Ho Kai Neo [1932] MLJ 76 (refd) Sfeir & Co v National Insurance Co of New Zealand Ltd [1964] 1 Lloyd's Rep 330 (refd) Sun-Line (Management) Ltd v Canpotex Shipping ......
-
Madihill Development Sdn Bhd v Sinesinga Sdn Bhd
...4 SLR (R) 365; [2009] 4 SLR 365 (folld) Enactment No 10 of 1922, The Judgments (Reciprocity) Enactment, Re; Ho Hong Bank Ltd v Ho Kai Neo [1932] MLJ 76 (folld) Lam Soon Cannery Co v H W Hooper & Co [1965] MLJ 135 (folld) Lam Soon Cannery Co v Hooper & Co [1965-1967] SLR (R) 149; [1965-1968]......
-
Malaysia Marine ABD Heavy Engineering Sdn Bhd v VLK Traders Singapore Pte Ltd
...that the Defendant had submitted or agreed to submit to the jurisdiction of the Malaysian court. In Ho Hong Bank Ltd v Ho Kai Neo & Anor [1932] MLJ 76, the court stated (correctly, in my opinion) that “sub-s 3(2)(b) which deals with the case of defendants not ordinarily resident or carrying......
-
Madihill Development Sdn Bhd and another v Sinesinga Sdn Bhd (transferee to part of the assets of United Merchant Finance Bhd)
...The first is In The Matter Of Enactment No 10 Of 1922, The Judgments (Reciprocity) Enactment; Ho Hong Bank Ltd v Ho Kai Neo & Anor [1932] MLJ 76 (“Ho Kai Neo”). The plaintiff had applied ex parte for leave to register a Singapore judgment in Johore under the Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgme......
Request a trial to view additional results