Emeka Promise v PP

JurisdictionMalaysia
CourtCourt of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Murugan a/l Manoharan v Public Prosecutor
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • PP v Maitham K Alwan (IRQ)
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Ajeng Yulia v Public Prosecutor, 04-05-2016
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • 4 May 2016
    ...negated or rebutted the defence on the existence of Stanley as asserted by the appellant. Learned counsel relied on Emeka Promise v PP [2015] 3 CLJ 916 to support his argument. Promise (supra), this Court held that it was important for the prosecution to lead evidence on the hand phones as ......
  • Ajeng Yulia v Public Prosecutor, 04-05-2016
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • 4 May 2016
    ...negated or rebutted the defence on the existence of Stanley as asserted by the appellant. Learned counsel relied on Emeka Promise v PP [2015] 3 CLJ 916 support his argument. [40] In Emeka Promise (supra), this Court held that it was important for the prosecution to lead evidence on the hand......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT