Dato' Haji Nik Mahmud bin Daud v Bank Islam Malaysia Bhd
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Malaysia) |
| Judgment Date | 1998 |
| Year | 1998 |
| Date | 1998 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
17 cases
2 firm's commentaries
-
The Curious Case Of The Double Sale: Reconciling The BBA Transaction With Section 214A Of The National Land Code
...the BBA in this case, are valid and are recognised financial transactions (Dato' Hj Nik Mahmud bin Daud v Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad [1998] 3 MLJ 393). Section 214A of the NLC is intended to prevent actual and attempted transfers to the extent that it dispossesses the registered proprietor ......
-
The Curious Case Of The Double Sale: Reconciling The BBA Transaction With Section 214A Of The National Land Code
...the BBA in this case, are valid and are recognised financial transactions (Dato' Hj Nik Mahmud bin Daud v Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad [1998] 3 MLJ 393). Section 214A of the NLC is intended to prevent actual and attempted transfers to the extent that it dispossesses the registered proprietor ......
1 books & journal articles
-
THIRTY-FIVE YEARS OF THE MALAYSIAN JUDICIARY ADJUDICATING ISLAMIC FINANCE MATTERS
...of Islamic Financial and Capital Market Products and Services in Malaysia (Malaysia: LexisNexis, 2nd Ed, 2019). 57 [1987] 2 MLJ 192. 58 [1998] 3 CLJ 605; [1998] 3 MLJ 393. 59 [2006] 3 MLJ 67. 60 In fact, in some cases, the judgment debtor would take more than ten years to settle the judgmen......
