Dato Annas bin Khatib Jaafar v Sharifuddin Mohamed

JurisdictionMalaysia
CourtHigh Court (Malaysia)
Year2016

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Ifcon Technology Sdn Bhd and Others v Luqmanul Hakim Abd Rahim
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2022
  • CHANG HING KIANG vs PREMA BONANZA SDN BHD
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 30 July 2021
    ...the facts are of sufficient similarity…” [68] Mahkamah juga merujuk kepada kes Dato Anas bin Khatib Jaafar v Sharifuddin Mohamed & Ors [2016] 8 MLJ 180 yang mana Mahkamah telah memutuskan seperti berikut:“ [210] Therefore, in my judgement, the attempt by learned counsel for the first and se......
  • MICHAEL ERROLL HYDE vs PREMA BONANZA SDN. BHD
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 30 July 2021
    ...the facts are of sufficient similarity…” [68] Mahkamah juga merujuk kepada kes Dato Anas bin Khatib Jaafar v Sharifuddin Mohamed & Ors [2016] 8 MLJ 180 yang mana Mahkamah telah memutuskan seperti berikut:“ [210] Therefore, in my judgement, the attempt by learned counsel for the first and se......