CIMB Bank Bhd v Sivadevi a/p Sivalingam
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Date | 2020 |
| Year | 2020 |
| Court | Federal Court (Malaysia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Goj Wa 38 293 03 19
...Rakyat Malaysia v. Daya Plaza Sdn Bhd, Empire Possession Sdn Bhd (Intervener) [1998] 5 CLJ 79 (HC) CIMB Bank Bhd v. Sivadevi Sivalingam [2020] 1 MLJ 583; [2020] 2 CLJ 151 Cuckmere Brick Co Ltd v. Mutual Finance Ltd [1971] Ch 949; [1971] 2 All ER 633 (CA) K Rajasekhar a/l Kanapathy v. Public......
-
MOHAMAD HAFIZ SAIRULLAH BIN MAHADI vs PENDAKWA RAYA
...see Dato’ Mohamed Hashim Shamsuddin v Attorney- General, Hong Kong [1986] 2 MLJ 112 FC and CIMB Bank Bhd v Sivadevi a/p Sivalingam [2020] 1 MLJ 583 [66] Under the circumstances, the prosecution can either prove: (a) The appellants were armed with any deadly weapon; or (b) The appellant had ......
-
Golden Pavilion Development Sdn Bhd vs Jasa Panorama Sdn Bhd, 26-06-2020
...untuk mewujudkan suatu kausa tindakan terhadap Defendan Ketiga. Berdasarkan kes Mahkamah Persekutuan CIMB Bank Bhd v Sivadevi Sivalingam [2020] 2 CLJ 151; [2019] 1 LNS 1904, kausa tindakan timbul pada masa “… is established that there is in existence a person who can sue and another who can......
-
SOUTHEAST ASIA SPECIAL ASSET MANAGEMENT BERHAD vs ASOKAN A/L KRISHNASAMY
...that is upon the failure of the Defendant to make good on the Borang 16D statutory demand. [18] In CIMB Bank Bhd v. Sivadevi Sivalingam [2020] 2 CLJ 151, the law A breach by the charger of the agreement in the charge, even one which has been continuing for one month or for such alternative ......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Chargors & Chargees ' The Clock Is Ticking
...period is not applicable to charge actions2. Interestingly, in the fairly recent Federal Court case ofCIMB Bank Bhd v Sivadevi Sivalingam[2020] 2 CLJ 151, although the Court reached a unanimous decision, the reasoning of the Judges differed. Justice Ahmad Maarop PCA was of the view that the......