CIMB Bank Bhd v Sivadevi a/p Sivalingam
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Date | 2020 |
| Year | 2020 |
| Court | Federal Court (Malaysia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
- Zuliaha Selamat and Another v Majlis Amanah Rakyat and Another
- Thameez Nisha Hasseem v Maybank Allied Bank Bhd
-
Goj Wa 38 293 03 19
...Rakyat Malaysia v. Daya Plaza Sdn Bhd, Empire Possession Sdn Bhd (Intervener) [1998] 5 CLJ 79 (HC) CIMB Bank Bhd v. Sivadevi Sivalingam [2020] 1 MLJ 583; [2020] 2 CLJ 151 Cuckmere Brick Co Ltd v. Mutual Finance Ltd [1971] Ch 949; [1971] 2 All ER 633 (CA) K Rajasekhar a/l Kanapathy v. Public......
-
MOHAMAD HAFIZ SAIRULLAH BIN MAHADI vs PENDAKWA RAYA
...see Dato’ Mohamed Hashim Shamsuddin v Attorney- General, Hong Kong [1986] 2 MLJ 112 FC and CIMB Bank Bhd v Sivadevi a/p Sivalingam [2020] 1 MLJ 583 [66] Under the circumstances, the prosecution can either prove: (a) The appellants were armed with any deadly weapon; or (b) The appellant had ......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Chargors & Chargees ' The Clock Is Ticking
...period is not applicable to charge actions2. Interestingly, in the fairly recent Federal Court case ofCIMB Bank Bhd v Sivadevi Sivalingam[2020] 2 CLJ 151, although the Court reached a unanimous decision, the reasoning of the Judges differed. Justice Ahmad Maarop PCA was of the view that the......