CIMB Bank Bhd v Anthony Lawrence Bourke and Another
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Judgment Date | 2019 |
| Date | 2019 |
| Year | 2019 |
| Court | Federal Court (Malaysia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
MRA INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD vs SPC DIATECH, LLC
...the time within which he may thus enforce his rights, is void to that extent.”. [190] In CIMB Bank Bhd v Anthony Lawrence Bourke & Anor [2019] 2 MLJ 1, the issue before the apex court was whether clause 12 of the loan agreement which was executed by the parties offends s 29 CA The said clau......
-
AURA INDAH JAYA SDN BHD vs OCBC BANK (MALAYSIA) BERHAD
...and is unlawful/void (para 51 Enc. 22) citing in support the 12 Federal Court decision in CIMB Bank Bhd v Anthony Lawrence Bourke & Anor [2019] 2 MLJ 1; (v) The threshold for striking out has not been met as the issues involve complex issues of law and/or construction to be determined by th......
- Iskandar Polo Club Ipoh v Nor Yatimah Osman
- Fairview Schools Berhad v Jasvindar Kaur Kartar Singh & 2 Ors
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Legal Remedies For Scams
...observe reasonable skill and care when executing the customer's instructions. 7 ibid 8 In CIMB Bank Bhd v Anthony Lawrence Bourke & Anor [2019] 2 MLJ 1, the Federal Court held that an exclusion clause that absolutely restrains legal proceedings is void under section 29 of the Contracts Act ......