Chong Nyuk Min and Another; PP

JurisdictionMalaysia
CourtHigh Court (Malaysia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Nanda Kumar Kunyikanan v Public Prosecutor
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Public Prosecutor v Shaik Raheem s/o Abdul Shaik Shaikh Dawood
    • Singapore
    • District Court (Singapore)
    • 25 April 2006
    ...to falsely implicate the Accused. 197. It is trite law that witnesses should not discuss their evidence: PP v Chong Nyuk Min & Anor [1995] 3 MLJ 642; Gary Skinner [1994] 99 Cr App R 212, 216. Where the allegation is that the complainants are telling deliberate untruths, the established ......
  • DT v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • District Court (Singapore)
    • 28 April 2001
    ...she ([D]) was cross-examined. 96. As a general rule, witnesses should not discuss about their evidence: PP v Chong Nyuk Min & Anor [1995] 3 MLJ 642; Gary Skinner [1994] 99 Cr App R 212, 216. In Lee Kwang Peng v PP [1997] 3 SLR 278, the Chief Justice had laid down the approach to be take......
  • Muhamad Nor bin Daod @ Mat Irat lwn Pendakwa Raya
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2010

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT