Chatib bin Kari v Mosbert Bhd ((in Liquidation))
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Year | 1984 |
| Court | High Court (Malaysia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 cases
- OCBC Bank Malaysia Berhad v Metroplex Berhad
- Emporium Jaya (Bentong) Sdn Bhd ((in Liquidation)) v Emporium Jaya (Jerantut) Sdn Bhd
- Chiah Ah Foo and Others; Ng Kheng Yeow
-
Precious Shipping Public Company Ltd v OW Bunker Far East (Singapore) Pte Ltd
...I am of the view that the “balance of convenience and the demands of justice” (see Chatib bin Kari v Mosbert Bhd (in liquidation) [1984] 2 MLJ 67) favour the grant of leave. The present case is unique in that the insolvent companies are not defendants per se but, rather, they are competing ......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
CLAIMS FOR INTEREST IN WINDING UP AND BANKRUPTCY
...NSWR 612 at 614; Re Am Co Ltd[1980] 1 Ch 196 at 204C; Re Securitibank Ltd[1980] 2 NZLR 714 at 724—5; Chatib bin Kari v Mosbert Bhd[1984] 2 MLJ 67 at 72; Re Atlantic Computer Systems plc[1992] Ch 515 at 520E—521E. 42 These courses of action do not apply to a secured creditor who does not lod......
-
SECURITY DEPOSIT ARRANGEMENTS IN INSOLVENCY
...714 at 724—5. 45 See Re David Lloyd & Co(1877) 6 ChD 339 at 344—45. This passage was cited with approval in Chatib bin Kari v Mosbert Bhd[1984] 2 MLJ 67 at 72 and Re Atlantic Computer Systems plc[1992] Ch 505 at 520F—521E. See also Re Aro Co Ltd[1980] 1 Ch 196 at 204C. 46 Supra, note 20. 47......