Captain Rudolph Adrain Joseph v Malaysian Airline System Bhd; CIMB Bank Bhd (Garnishee)
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Court | High Court (Malaysia) |
| Year | 2008 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 cases
-
TAN PHIT SIAN vs LING SEI NGIIK
...AC 482, PC. In Captain Rudolph Adrian Joseph v 22 [TAN PHIT SIAN VS LING SEI NGIIK, BKI-22NCvC-103/10-2016] Malaysian Airline System Bhd [2008] 5 MLJ 392, where a consent order has been made, drawn up and The Court held that the court was thus functus officio and such order could not be var......
-
Mohamed Yusoff bin Mohd Haniff v Umi Kalsom bte Abas
...can also be varied or set aside with the consent of the parties: see Captain Rudolf Adrian Joseph v Malaysian Airline System Bhd & Anor [2008] 5 MLJ 392, Zainuddin bin Muhammad v Atsco Ltd & Anor [2003] 1 MLJ 369 and Visia Finance Bhd v Expert Credit & Leasing Sdn Bhd & Ors [1998] 2 MLJ 705......