Arulpragasan a/l Sandaraju v PP

JurisdictionMalaysia
CourtFederal Court (Malaysia)
Judgment Date1997
Year1997
Date1997

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
55 cases
2 books & journal articles
  • THE PERSISTENT PROBLEM OF THE PROSECUTOR’S PRIMA FACIE1 BURDEN
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1997, December 1997
    • 1 December 1997
    ...Chong Boo See[1988] 3 MLJ 292 (HC Msia). 13 Khoo Hi Chiang [1994] 1 MLJ 265 (SC Msia). 14 Tan Boon Kean [1995] 3 MLJ 514 (FC Msia). 15 [1997] 1 MLJ 1 (FC Msia). There was a 4—2 majority, and no trace in the report of how the seventh judge (Anuar CJ (Malaya)) voted. 16 Criminal Procedure Cod......
  • CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY AND SECTION 17A OF THE MALAYSIAN ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION ACT
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2020, January - December 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...Prosecutor [2014] 6 MLJ 208. 56 See, eg, Ramiah v Public Prosecutor [1986] 1 MLJ 301 and Arulpragasan a/l Sandaraju v Public Prosecutor [1997] 1 MLJ 1. 57 Section 7(2) of the UK Bribery Act 2010 (c 23) which is similar to s 17A(4) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 (Act 69......