Anthonysamy v PP
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia |
| Year | 1956 |
| Court | High Court (Malaysia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
- Adnan bin Khamis v PP
-
Mah Kah Yew v Public Prosecutor
... ... It is sufficient for us to say that we fully concur with the reasons given in the judgment of Buhagiar J in Anthonysamy v PP [1956] MLJ 247 in which the learned judge sets out his reasons for agreeing with the decision in Woo Sing v R. Appeal allowed ... ...
- Adnan bin Khamis; PP
-
Lim Poh Eng v Public Prosecutor
...for the purposes of ss 256 (b) and 256 (c) of the CPC: at [44] and [45]. Adnan bin Khamis v PP [1972] 1 MLJ 274 (refd) Anthonysamy v PP [1956] MLJ 247 (refd) Blyth v The Co. of Proprietors of the Birmingham Water Works (1856) 11 Exch 781; (1856) 156 ER 1047 (refd) Bolam v Friern Hospital Ma......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
MANAGING MENS REA IN SINGAPORE
...down a different standard of negligence in civil and criminal cases”. 106 The earliest clear articulation of this was in Anthonysamy v PP[1956] MLJ 247 (“negligence for the purposes of s 304A and of other sections in the Code where negligence is an ingredient of the offence is the same as i......
-
DEFINING THE FAULT ELEMENTS OF DRIVING OFFENCES
...imprisonment. 8 Namely, a maximum penalty of six months’ imprisonment. 9 [1973] 2 MLJ 177. 10 For the civil standard, see Anthonysamy v PP[1956] MLJ 247. For an intermediate standard, see PP v Joseph Chin Saiko[1972] 2 MLJ 129. The Federal Court case of Adnan bin Khamis v PP[1972] 1 MLJ 274......