Amaravathi and Others; S Pathmanathan

JurisdictionMalaysia
Year1979
CourtHigh Court (Malaysia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Artic Building and Civil Engineering Sdn Bhd v Ahmad Zaki Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • January 1, 2009
  • Eller, Urs v Cheong Kiat Wah
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • May 21, 2020
    ...with property in a manner inconsistent with the right of the plaintiff” (Koh Wee Meng at [119], citing S Pathmanathan v Amaravathi [1979] 1 MLJ 38). In my view, the facts of the present case do not correspond to either of the two situations described above. I agree with the plaintiff that K......
  • Koh Wee Meng v Trans Eurokars Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • May 27, 2014
    ...Ltd [2007] 2 SLR (R) 1048; [2007] 2 SLR 1048 (folld) Rogers v Parish (Scarborough) Ltd [1987] QB 933 (refd) S Pathmanathan v Amaravathi [1979] 1 MLJ 38 (refd) Sale of Goods Act (Cap 393, 1999 Rev Ed) ss 14 (2) , 14 (2 A) , 14 (2 B) , 14 (3) , 53 (2) , 53 (3) (consd) ;ss 11, 14, 53 Davinder ......
  • Koh Wee Meng v Trans Eurokars Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • May 27, 2014
    ...and saw the defendant dealing with property in a manner inconsistent with the right of the plaintiff: S Pathmanathan v Amaravathi & Ors [1979] 1 MLJ 38 (“S Pathmanathan”). I do not accept the defendant’s position. There are two situations in which acquiescence can be established. The first ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT